Skip to content

search   cart   my account   contact


Catch fast clearance, aggregation, and immunogenicity before they kill your drug candidate.

The Polyreactivity Panel quantifies non-specific binding across an 8-plex or 16-plex ligand panel in a single label-free run. It runs on the same MACS® Matchmaker chip and sample as your target binding kinetics. Score every candidate against the Jain et al. 2017 clinical-stage mAb benchmark.

8 or 16-plex
Defined ligands per chip
~30 min
Per candidate
pg/mm²
Direct mass readout
DDI
Pre-conjugated, ready-to-use
Scientific Background

Polyreactivity is a top developability liability, and it is currently measured off-instrument.

Why polyreactivity drives clinical attrition

Polyreactive antibodies, those that bind structurally unrelated antigens through non-specific surface chemistry, exhibit accelerated serum clearance, elevated immunogenicity risk, self-association, and aggregation. Hötzel et al. (2012) showed that even modest polyreactivity correlates with poor pharmacokinetics in human subjects. Jain et al.'s 2017 survey of 137 clinical-stage monoclonal antibodies established that polyreactivity scores correlate with progression through clinical development.

The biophysical liability is set by surface charge patches, hydrophobic residues, and non-specific affinity for membranes, nucleic acids, and abundant plasma proteins. Once a polyreactive lead enters lead optimization, catching it later is expensive: in pharmacokinetic (PK) studies, in toxicology, in early clinical. The cost can be measured in months and millions.

Industry-standard methods are off-instrument and slow

Standard polyreactivity readouts are plate-based: PSR-ELISA on a soluble-membrane preparation, AC-SINS on aggregated antibody, BV-ELISA on baculovirus particles. Each consumes tens of micrograms of candidate per measurement, takes hours per plate, and runs on a different instrument than the target binding assay.

The result is that polyreactivity is measured after affinity ranking is complete, often after a lead candidate has been committed. The MACS® Matchmaker Polyreactivity Panel runs on the same chip and the same sample as your target binding kinetics. It uses the same fluidics and the same data export, and takes approximately 30 minutes per candidate.

The Problem & Our Approach

Plate-based polyreactivity assays break the discovery cycle. The panel is built to fit it.

Polyreactivity has to be screened during candidate selection, not after. Conventional methods are too slow and too material-hungry to be run on every candidate at every cycle. Polyreactivity is therefore typically measured only on a short-list, late, when course corrections are expensive. The Polyreactivity Panel uses the same focal molography surface as the target-binding assay. The ligands are immobilized via DNA-directed immobilization (DDI) with a single NHS-amine conjugation chemistry, and the protocol is the same single-cycle kinetics. The polyreactivity readout drops into the same pipeline, the same buffer, the same sample volume, the same instrument.

⏱
Off-instrument plate methods → 30-min on-instrument

PSR-ELISA, AC-SINS, and BV-ELISA each take hours per plate and run separately from the target-binding assay. MACS® Matchmaker runs the polyreactivity panel as a single label-free run on the same chip as the affinity assay, in approximately 30 minutes per candidate.

⤆
Material-hungry → micrograms

Plate methods consume tens of micrograms of antibody per candidate per readout. MACS® Matchmaker runs the polyreactivity panel on the same low-volume sample injection used for target binding, freeing material for the kinetic assay and downstream characterization.

≈
Heterogeneous reagents → defined ligands

Soluble-membrane PSR preparations and aggregated antibody preps are heterogeneous and lot-to-lot variable. MACS® Matchmaker uses commercial, recombinant or highly purified ligands plus defined amine-functionalized lipids and glycosaminoglycans, all conjugated through a single NHS chemistry. No aggregates, no membrane preparations, no carrier-protein conjugates.

⚙
Late-stage flag → at every discovery cycle

Off-instrument workflows force polyreactivity to be measured only on a triaged short-list. MACS® Matchmaker lets the polyreactivity panel run on every candidate at every cycle, alongside affinity, surfacing developability liabilities at the earliest decision point.

Applications in Focus

Where the Polyreactivity Panel delivers value.

The same chip, sample, and protocol address three distinct workflows across antibody discovery and developability.

Discovery
Drop polyreactive candidates before lead optimization

Run the panel on every candidate alongside the target affinity measurement. Surface polyreactivity at the earliest selection point, before resources are committed to lead optimization. The Polyreactivity Index converts the multi-axis readout into a single quantitative number that can be paired directly with KD in candidate-ranking tables.

Lead Optimization
Rank engineered variants on the developability axis

Fc engineering, charge-patch removal, and CDR optimization can each shift the polyreactivity profile in unintended directions. The panel ranks engineered variants on the polyreactivity axis with the same within-chip statistics as the affinity measurement, in the same experiment.

Developability
Score every candidate before lead-nomination

Build the Polyreactivity Index into the standard developability data package alongside FcRn, target KD, hydrophobic interaction chromatography, and self-interaction. Anchored to the Jain 2017 clinical-stage benchmark distribution, the PI gives a calibrated risk score that travels with the candidate into formulation and IND-enabling work.

Two Configurations

One workflow. Two depths of liability coverage.

Polyreactivity Essentials, 8-plex

The triage configuration. One ligand per major liability axis, with Protein A/G as the Fc-capture positive control. The axes are dsDNA, human serum albumin, insulin, lysozyme, aminocardiolipin, aminoheparin, and alpha-1-acid glycoprotein. 8 within-chip replicates per ligand for high-confidence statistics from a single experiment.

Built for the routine candidate-triage workflow at every discovery cycle. Drop polyreactive candidates early without consuming the material and the time of a full developability panel.

Polyreactivity Plus, 16-plex

The in-depth configuration. Adds a second nucleic-acid surface (ssDNA alongside dsDNA) and seven further plasma and matrix proteins. These are alpha-1-antitrypsin, apo-transferrin, complement C3d, apolipoprotein A-I, vitamin D-binding protein, beta-2-microglobulin, and gelatin. 4 within-chip replicates per ligand, with the breadth needed for cross-axis liability mapping.

Built for the developability assessment that supports lead-nomination and IND-enabling work. The breadth of axes resolves which liability drives the score and informs targeted engineering.

Workflow

One injection. All axes. Approximately 30 minutes.

The chip is loaded once with the pre-conjugated ligand panel via DNA-directed immobilization. Each candidate then runs a single ascending-concentration injection series in HBS-EP+ pH 7.4. The polyreactivity response is read simultaneously across all 8 or 16 ligand spots. The running buffer wash regenerates between candidates for routine screening. A brief glycine pH 2.0 strip recovers the Protein A/G spot for high-throughput cycles.

One injection. All axes. Approximately 30 minutes.
Protocol details
  • Total time
    ~30 min
    single SCK, 3 ascending concentrations
  • Concentrations
    3 steps, 30 / 100 / 300 nM
  • Per step
    120 s contact / 300 s dissociation
  • Readout
    Polyreactivity Index normalized to Protein A/G

Eight axes or sixteen. Thirty minutes either way.

Run the Polyreactivity Panel on a real candidate. Your candidate. Book a 30-minute demo with one of our application scientists.

Key Capabilities

What makes MACS® Matchmaker the purpose-built solution for this workflow.

8 or 16-plex
Two configurations for two use cases

Polyreactivity Essentials (8 ligands, one per major liability axis) for routine triage. Polyreactivity Plus (16 ligands, adding seven plasma and matrix proteins plus ssDNA) for in-depth developability. Both run on the same instrument with the same protocol.

Quantitative PI
How the index is calculated

The Polyreactivity Index is the mean response across non-control ligand spots, each normalized to the ligand immobilized on that same mologram in the same run. Protein A/G is a run-validity control, not a denominator. Every result is reported with the full ligand fingerprint alongside the index.

Single chemistry
NHS-conjugated DDI

All ligands are conjugated through a single NHS amine-reactive chemistry to amine-modified DDI oligos. No aggregates, no soluble-membrane preparations, no carrier-protein hapten conjugates. Lot-to-lot reproducibility designed in.

~30 min
Same chip as target binding

The polyreactivity panel runs on the same MACS® Matchmaker chip and the same sample injection used for the target affinity assay. Polyreactivity moves into the discovery cycle instead of running parallel to it.

pg/mm²
Direct mass detection

Coherent mass density at each ligand spot is a direct physical readout of bound mass, not a refractive-index proxy. The Polyreactivity Index is therefore built on a physical mass readout rather than an arbitrary unit.

Built-in QC
Protein A/G plus replicates

The Protein A/G spot provides a per-injection Fc-capture quality control: absence of signal flags candidate or run failure before any PI is computed. 8 (Essentials) or 4 (Plus) within-chip replicates per ligand provide within-chip confidence intervals from a single experiment.

Method Comparison

MACS® Matchmaker vs. plate-based polyreactivity methods.

PSR-ELISA, AC-SINS, and BV-ELISA are the established plate methods. The comparison below addresses the developability-screening workflow specifically.

ParameterMACS® MatchmakerPSR-ELISA / AC-SINS / BV-ELISA
Time per candidate✓ ~30 min single chiphours of plate work
Sample consumption✓ µg-scale, shared with target assay10s of µg per candidate per readout
Same workflow as target binding✓ Yes, same chip, same sampleNo, separate instrument and prep
Plex (defined ligands)✓ 8 or 16, defined ligands1 to 3 per assay (axis-specific)
Reagent definition✓ Recombinant or purified, single NHS chemistrySoluble-membrane preps, aggregated antibody, baculovirus particles
Replicates per ligand✓ 8 (Essentials) / 4 (Plus) within-chipPlate triplicate typical
Quantitative score✓ Polyreactivity Index, pg/mm² readoutSemi-quantitative or relative
Application Note

Get the full panel composition and threshold validation.

An application note describes the two-configuration panel design and the per-axis ligand rationale. It covers the Polyreactivity Index calculation and the threshold anchoring against the Jain 2017 clinical-stage mAb distribution. It includes the controls used to validate the assay. Trastuzumab and adalimumab serve as low-PI controls; the HIV broadly neutralizing antibodies 4E10 and 2F5 as high-PI controls.

FAQ

Questions we hear most often.

Q.What is the polyreactivity panel?
The polyreactivity panel is a single ready-to-use sensor chip carrying 8 or 16 defined ligands immobilized via DNA-directed immobilization (DDI). Essentials (8-plex) covers one ligand per major liability axis: Protein A/G control, dsDNA, HSA, insulin, lysozyme, aminocardiolipin, aminoheparin, and alpha-1-acid glycoprotein. Plus (16-plex) adds alpha-1-antitrypsin, apo-transferrin, complement C3d, apolipoprotein A-I, vitamin D-binding protein, beta-2-microglobulin, gelatin, and ssDNA. One label-free single-cycle kinetics (SCK) run with three ascending concentrations scores polyreactivity across all ligands in approximately 30 minutes. It uses the same chip and sample as your target binding kinetics. The panel runs on the MACS® Matchmaker focal molography instrument from lino Biotech AG. It anchors the Polyreactivity Index (PI) to the Jain et al. 2017 clinical-stage mAb benchmark. That catches fast clearance, aggregation, and immunogenicity liabilities before they kill drug candidates.
Q.What is the Polyreactivity Index (PI)?
The PI is the mean response across all non-control ligand spots, each normalized to the ligand immobilized on that same mologram in the same run. Because loading and response are read on the same spot, run-to-run immobilization differences cancel in the ratio. That is what makes the number reflect the antibody rather than the surface. Protein A/G is a run-validity control, not a denominator. The PI is always reported together with the ligand fingerprint. The shape of the response across ligands distinguishes a narrow, charge-driven liability from a broad one, and a single number cannot.
Q.Which configuration should I use, Essentials or Plus?
Essentials (8-plex) is built for the routine candidate-triage workflow at every discovery cycle: one ligand per major liability axis, 8 within-chip replicates, fastest readout. Plus (16-plex) is built for in-depth developability assessment near lead-nomination: seven further plasma and matrix proteins plus a second nucleic-acid surface. Programs typically run Essentials during discovery and Plus once a short-list of leads emerges.
Q.How does this differ from PSR-ELISA, AC-SINS, and BV-ELISA?
The plate methods are off-instrument, axis-specific, and material-hungry. Each measures one or two liability axes per assay, runs separately from the target-binding workflow, and consumes tens of micrograms of antibody per readout. The Polyreactivity Panel measures all 8 or 16 ligands simultaneously on the same chip and the same sample as the target affinity assay. It takes approximately 30 minutes. Plate methods remain useful as orthogonal confirmation; they are not a substitute for in-cycle screening.
Q.How do I set a pass/fail threshold?
Against your own reference set. The PI is a dimensionless ranking within a run, and we do not publish a fixed cutoff. The established assays in this field do not have transferable cutoffs either. The widely cited Jain et al. 2017 limits are the worst decile of one 137-antibody panel, that is, a percentile rather than an absolute value. In practice, run a known-clean and a known-sticky antibody from your own program alongside the candidates and read the ranking against them. We are calibrating an internal reference set and will publish absolute limits once they are supported by data.
Q.Does the DNA reference spot give meaningful data on a DDI surface?
Yes. The DNA reference spots (ssDNA, dsDNA in Plus; dsDNA in Essentials) carry defined sequence and length, distinct from the immobilization linker chemistry of the panel. Anti-DNA reactivity registers as authentic binding to the dedicated DNA reference and is interpretable on the panel-level readout.
Q.Is the panel compatible with IgG2, IgG4, and Fc-fusion proteins?
Yes. The panel is designed around Fc-mediated capture (Protein A/G as positive control) plus non-specific surface chemistry. Both are conserved across IgG subclasses and most Fc-fusion formats. Bispecific and IgG-fragment formats are supported case by case; contact us to discuss your specific format.
Q.Does the panel work on cell-culture supernatant?
Yes. Cell-culture supernatant performance is supported and is one of the panel's design targets, since the discovery-stage workflow it is built for runs on unpurified candidates. Extension to crude lysate or serum for polyreactivity specifically is currently being characterized internally.
Q.Does this replace target binding kinetics?
No. The Polyreactivity Panel runs alongside the target binding assay. It is a parallel readout on the same chip and the same sample injection, in the same experiment. The panel is the developability axis; the target affinity measurement is the potency axis. Both are needed.