Skip to content

search   cart   my account   contact


AI designs binders. Screen them at scale.

Measure up to 64 AI-designed binders in parallel on one sensor chip. Go from crude expression to binding kinetics with MACS® Matchmaker, directly from lysate.

Up to 64
Binders in parallel on one sensor chip
96
Coded pools organized on one plate
Lysate
No purification of each design
2
Capture routes, SpyTag or Twin-Strep-tag
The Concept

Turn design libraries into measured priorities.

AI protein design generates candidates for experimental testing. High-throughput binding characterization helps you compare those designs and select the next round. MACS® Matchmaker measures up to 64 binders in parallel, directly from lysate, and links each kinetic result to its design ID to guide selection and subsequent model refinement.

01 / Compute
Design a library

Generate and prioritize candidate sequences in your AI design workflow.

02 / Experiment
Screen 64 in parallel

Measure binding kinetics across coded panels of expressed designs.

03 / Learn
Inform the next round

Return binding profiles to your design process and select the next candidates. Model training and sequence generation remain part of your computational workflow.

The Problem & Our Approach

Why the bench slows down an AI design campaign.

The candidate list grows with every design round. The way binders are usually characterized does not.

1
Purify every design first

Most kinetic methods expect purified protein. For a design library, expression and purification of each candidate becomes the rate-limiting step, long before the first binding curve.

×
One interaction at a time

Sequential measurements scale linearly with the number of designs. Every additional round of candidates adds the same instrument time again.

≈
Endpoints hide kinetics

Endpoint binding signals and enrichment scores rank designs, but two binders with the same signal can have very different on- and off-rates. The model learns from the coarser number.

↻
The loop has to close quickly

Measured data are only useful to the next design round if they arrive while that round is being planned. A slow characterization step stretches every iteration of the campaign.

Current Methods

Where conventional methods fall short.

None of these are bad methods. They were built for purified samples or for selection, not for kinetic ranking of large libraries straight from expression.

MethodLimitation for screening AI-designed binders
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR)Few interactions per cycle, and candidates are usually purified first. For a large design library the sample preparation, not the measurement, sets the pace.
Biolayer interferometry (BLI)Parallel across a plate of tips, but each binder needs its own tip, and crude lysate adds nonspecific background to the refractive signal.
High-throughput SPR arraysHigh parallelism for antibody panels, but refractive-index sensing still has to be referenced carefully when the sample is a crude matrix.
ELISA and plate binding assaysEndpoint readouts. Binders with the same equilibrium signal but different kinetics look the same.
Display selection (phage, yeast)Ranks clones by enrichment under selection conditions, not by measured kon, koff and KD.
High-Throughput Experimental Screening

One pool. Up to 64 binder profiles.

Express your AI-designed candidates, assign DNA codes and pool up to 64 binders. DNA-directed immobilization (DDI) sorts each binder onto its assigned sensor spot.

01 / Express
Start with lysate
Three separate lysates containing different tagged binders

Express each AI-designed binder separately with a SpyTag or Twin-Strep-tag. Retain its design ID throughout the workflow.

02 / Code
Assign a DNA code
Each binder receives a capture adapter carrying a distinct DNA code

Add a different coded capture adapter to each lysate, with binder in excess over adapter.

03 / Pool
Pool up to 64 binders
A pool of coded binders is combined in one well

Combine coded lysates into one well. Organize additional pools across a 96-well plate for larger design libraries.

04 / Measure
Measure in parallel
Coded binders sort onto sensor spots before target binding is measured

Self-sort the pool on the chip, then measure target binding across up to 64 candidates in parallel. Regenerate and load the next pool. The curve illustrates single-cycle kinetics, it is not experimental data.

Scale beyond a single panel.

Combine 64-plex measurements with a 96-well pooling workflow to plan larger AI design campaigns. Measure each pool sequentially against the target.

96×64=6,144

Nominal design capacity: 96 pools × 64 positions, before controls and replicates. Actual throughput depends on the assay and regeneration performance.

Two Capture Routes

Choose the tag that fits your construct.

The capture adapter connects your tagged binder to its DNA code. Both routes feed into the same split-and-pool workflow, and both adapters are available in the webshop, pre-conjugated to the DNA code of your choice.

Covalent capture

SpyTag + Oligo Adapter SpyCatcher

SpyTag binder→Oligo Adapter SpyCatcher+DNA code

SpyTag on the binder reacts with the Oligo Adapter SpyCatcher to form a covalent bond. The adapter's DNA code provides the address on the sensor chip.

Affinity capture

Twin-Strep-tag® + Oligo Adapter Strep-Tactin® XT

Twin-Strep binder→Oligo Adapter Strep-Tactin® XT+DNA code

Twin-Strep-tag on the binder binds the Oligo Adapter Strep-Tactin® XT. This capture interaction attaches the binder to its DNA address.

Protocol

Protocol details.

What a screening campaign is built from, on the instrument and the consumables of the standard MACS Matchmaker workflow.

ParameterValue
SampleCrude lysate of separately expressed binders. Tag accessibility, expression level and sample compatibility need to be checked for your constructs.
Capture tagsSpyTag (covalent, Oligo Adapter SpyCatcher) or Twin-Strep-tag (affinity, Oligo Adapter Strep-Tactin® XT).
ImmobilizationDNA-directed immobilization (DDI). The DNA code on each adapter assigns the binder to its sensor spot.
Adapter ratioBinder in excess over adapter, which favors loading of the coded adapters before pooling. The suitable ratio depends on expression level and capture efficiency.
Plex per chipUp to 64 binders measured in parallel. Controls and replicates reduce the number of unique candidates.
PoolsOrganized across a 96-well plate and measured sequentially against the target, with regeneration between pools.
Nominal design capacity96 pools × 64 positions = 6,144, before controls and replicates. Actual throughput depends on the assay and regeneration performance.
Readoutkon, koff and KD where the data support a kinetic model, from a target concentration series.
Data for the Next Design Round

Rank AI designs by measured binding.

kon
How fast does it bind?

Compare association rates to see how quickly each binder engages the target.

koff
How long does it stay?

Compare dissociation rates to distinguish interactions with different complex lifetimes.

KD
How strong is the interaction?

Combine association and dissociation rates to estimate affinity under an appropriate binding model.

Lysate
No purification step

Tagged binders are captured directly from the expression lysate, so every design reaches the chip without its own purification.

Design ID
Data that map back

Each DNA code maps to one design ID, so every kinetic result returns to the right sequence in your model.

Regenerate
The next pool on the same chip

Regenerate the surface and load the next pool, so a plate of pools runs as one campaign.

After the Binding Screen

Binding is round one. Developability is round two.

A design that binds its target can still fail later through nonspecific binding or poor behavior in plasma. Take your shortlisted binders into developability panels that run on the same instrument, directly in complex samples.

Developability
Polyreactivity Panel

Flag nonspecific binding and other developability liabilities before a design moves forward. Open the Polyreactivity Panel

ADME
Plasma Protein Binding

See how your lead designs behave in undiluted human plasma. Open Plasma Protein Binding

Service
Developability Data Service

Send your shortlist and receive a developability package run by our scientists. Open the Developability Data Service

Practical Questions

Before you build your panel.

Q.Do I need to purify every binder?
No. The workflow captures tagged binders directly from lysate. Tag accessibility, expression level and sample compatibility need to be checked for your constructs.
Q.Is Strep-Tactin the tag on my binder?
No. Twin-Strep-tag is fused to the binder, and Strep-Tactin® XT sits on the capture adapter. In the other route, SpyTag is fused to the binder and SpyCatcher sits on the adapter.
Q.Why use less adapter than binder?
Binder excess favors loading of the coded adapters before pooling. The suitable ratio depends on expression level and capture efficiency.
Q.What does the DNA code identify?
The code assigns a binder to a complementary address on the sensor chip. It is an immobilization handle, not the binder's protein sequence.
Q.What does 64-plex mean for my screening campaign?
Up to 64 binders can be measured in parallel on one sensor chip. Controls and replicates reduce the number of unique candidates. A 96-well plate can organize multiple pools, and measurement time and chip reuse depend on the assay.
Q.How do the results support AI design?
Map each DNA code to its design ID, then use the measured binding profiles to select candidates and inform your next design round. Model training and sequence generation remain part of your computational workflow.

Your next AI design library. Ready for experimental screening.

Bring your target and your candidate count. We help you plan a 64-plex screening workflow with SpyTag or Twin-Strep-tag capture.